Morrison and Wallace discuss how we
should live our life and what should be left in our wake. Although they differ
in ways like the metaphor of life and what kind of perception we should have in
our lives.
A negative tone is something both
authors have in common. Wallace conveys this by saying that we are all self-centered,
therefore everyone around us is wrong and “just in my way”. The boys from the
Nobel Price lecture are portrayed as nuisances that waste time of the old
woman. This hostility the authors put into the text allows readers to grasp
that we take for granted the community and peers around us. Thus limiting ourselves
to one lens or blindness. “This is water, this is water”, Wallace begins the
piece with two fish swimming passed and older fish asking “what the hell is
water”. This metaphor that he used is a reminder showing that that we often get
caught up in the same day to day routine of life that we forget to realize what
if right in front of us, what we have and that we spend too much time not
closely paying attention to the things around us. The bird is what Morrison
uses to convey life; this thing that has two options living or dead. And expressed
that no matter what state the bird is in, it was created that way by our doing,
“it is in your hands”. Breaking the norm, seeing more than what’s meets the
eye, these are things both authors what the readers to do. Not to merely exist
nor live life through only one lens, but taking the time to stop for a second
step out to the daily routine and look at your surroundings in a different way.
When
our lives should count is when differences arise between the authors. Wallace believes
that our lives should be all about the now. That we should challenge ourselves
to be more than the walking dead, than the norm to the conformity of the brain
and everyone else roaming around on default, because this this is the time to experience
what’s waiting right in front of us to discover in a different and new way. “We
die. That may be the meaning of life. But we do Language. That may be the measure
of our lives” Morrison believes that dying is this event that happens and that
living is just the thing before it, but the mark and language we leave behind is
what really counts. Leaving behind our own individual marking on the world
allows others to grow and learn from our lives. Valuing the present or the
future to the next generation is where they vary.
I would have to agree with the statement that both authors enjoy portraying a negative connotation on life, constantly describing different occasions where adults fall into the everyday lifestyle and get bored with their lives. I also like the way that you were able to pinpoint their usage of symbolism through the bird in Morrison’s story. My favorite part was the ending when you mentioned that it was important to leave a piece of you behind in this world so that once you’re gone, you will still have had an impact on the world and the people around you.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with your statement that both of the speakers have a negative connotation on life. I disagree with that because I believe both speakers are very optimistic in the way they think. For instance, Toni Morrison who speaks as if she is the elderly woman in the story, speaks of this woman that through her open minded thinking removes the shroud of her first instinct to reveal that she does not know whether the bird is alive, dead, or even there. Due to the many possibilities of the outcome for the question presented to her and the minimal information she has to answer that question she thinks that it is better to just admit she has no answer instead of giving the wrong one; to me, I believe this is optimistic thinking rather than negative thinking due to the fact that she used the power of thought to arouse an answer that the taunters were not expecting. Wallace is also optimistic in his thinking which can be very obviously shown through his use of stopping and thinking that maybe he isn't the center of the universe and maybe there are people with obviously more important things to do than him.
ReplyDelete