When i started reading the "Noble Lecture" I found it to be very much more difficult to understan and i found my self reading paragraphs over and over again. This lecture was said in a way different then the first passage and it was much harder for me to comprehend the meaning. As I continued to read more in depth into the essay i realized that Morrison was using the bird and the old woman to represent language. Her reply to the young boys demonstrates how we need to use our words wisely because how you speak is a reflection of who you are.
At first when i finished reading each passage I was very confused and could not find out how they were related in any way. After more thought and going over my notes I think I found in what way these two passages are alike and different. These two stories tie together by both pointing out that what you say and what you think is a reflection of you and how you live your life. They are different in one way by the generation that they are speaking to. For example it was hard for me to understand Morrisons passage because she was speaking to and older generation that attended the nobel peace prize, where as Wallace was speaking directly to my generation.
I strongly agree with your first paragraph because it definitely made me stop and think about myself and how I am way more self-centered than I ever thought of myself to be. I also agree when you said that self-default isn't a bad thing because everybody was born with that. Everybody, no matter who they are or how they were raised, has a self-default. It's just natural. In your second paragraph you said towards the end that what you say is a reflection of who you are and I also agree with that but slightly disagree because sometimes we do get very upset sometimes and say things we don't mean, but then again if those words are coming out of your mouth then it's what was what you were thinking in your head all along.
ReplyDelete