There are numerous similarities and differences between the
several parables included in “Zen Parables” and “Existentialism” by Jean-Paul
Sartre on the topic of world views. Specifically in the way that both passages
look at human behavior while still thinking of the universe in the big picture
aspect, not so much specifically. One
similarity or connection occurs with Learning to Be Silent, Jean- Paul Sartre makes
the point that “man chooses his own self” but that in doing this we “also
choose all men”, meaning that when we choose to make a decision for ourselves
in the bigger picture our decision sets a precedent for everyone else around
us, making us responsible for all of mankind around us. Just like when the
first boy began talking he set an example for the other kids and in pointing
out his wrong doing all four of them ended up breaking their vow of silence. The
first boy chose himself which in turn affected the others making him
responsible for them too.
The biggest difference between the passages is the structure
of them and the way their ideas are presented. The Zen Parables was composed of
three separate stories that each taught a lesson independent of one another. The first Zen Parable, “Muddy Road” , teaches
the lesson of letting go of the past and living in the present, more
specifically inconsequential events. Ekido harbors confusion and negative
energy about Tanzan helping the young woman because “monks don’t go near
females”, and when he voices his opinion Tanzan replies “I left the girl there”
, meaning he has let the situation go, and poses the question of “are you still
carrying her?”, asking Ekido if he is still stuck in the past and silently
urging him to move on. “A Parable” moves
on to teach us the lessons of living in the moment and finding the silver
lining in every bad situation. The tigers represent the man`s future and past,
both chasing him and trying to consume his being but he catches “hold of the
root of a wild vine and swung himself down over the edge” suspending him in the
air (the man`s present). He realizes that eventually he will fall and one of
the tigers will consume him but rather than focus on his demise he grasps “ the
vine with one hand, he plucked the strawberry with the other”, he found
something sweet in a time of despair. The last parable teaches us that
everything we do has consequences and sets the precedent for others around us
to follow suit. “Existenalism” was more of an essay and had his three separate ideas
presented in paragraph for and eventually tied them all together, making his
structure completely different from the Zen Parables.
I agree with all of your statements. The first three readings by Zen were all mainly about how we as humans need to not look in the past or search for the future but instead just live in the present. When we worry about what has already happened or what is going to happen next we miss what is happing in front of us in the current moment. The Existentialism was about how our actions and decisions are what makes us who we are. We first exist then we have the free will to choose how we act which sums up who we are as humans. I also agree with how you believe the stories to be different. The first three compared to the last reading were structured differently. The first three got straight to the point and each only had one teaching and the last one had three different ideas which at the end were tied together.
ReplyDelete